Linear mucosal defect may be characteristic of lansoprazole-associated collagenous colitis.

BACKGROUND: Although some cases of collagenous colitis have been induced by lansoprazole (LPZ), the clinicopathologic features of LPZ-associated collagenous colitis have not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic features of LPZ-associated collagenous colitis. DESIGN: Retrospective case study. PATIENTS: The subjects were 13 patients with collagenous colitis diagnosed during a period from 2002 to 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The colonoscopic and histopathologic findings were compared retrospectively between 9 cases of LPZ use (LPZ group) and 4 cases without the use of LPZ (non-LPZ group). RESULTS: A colonoscopy revealed a linear mucosal defect more frequently in the LPZ group (7 of 9 cases [78%]) than in the non-LPZ group (0 of 4 cases [0%], P = .02). Friable mucosa was also noted in 4 patients (44%) in the LPZ group but none in the non-LPZ group. The colonoscopic finding in the non-LPZ group was either normal mucosa or nonspecific minimal abnormalities, whereas patients in the LPZ group had either a linear mucosal defect, mucosal bleeding, or both (P = .001). On histologic examination, the subepithelial collagen band was thicker in patients in the LPZ group than in those in the non-LPZ group (median 45 vs 26.3 mum). All patients in the LPZ group recovered from diarrhea after discontinuance of LPZ. LIMITATION: A small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Linear mucosal defects and friable mucosa may be characteristic colonoscopic findings in cases of LPZ-associated collagenous colitis.

Effect of sulindac treatment for attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis with a new germline APC mutation at codon 161: report of a case.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis develop colorectal cancers if left untreated. As indicated in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, prophylactic colectomy has been recommended even in a milder colonic phenotype referred to as attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis. However, therapeutic strategies in attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis are still controversial. METHODS: We report a patient with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis who has been treated with sulindac for five years. During the period of observation, she has been carefully followed up by chromoscopic and radiographic surveillance. Immunohistochemical study for cyclooxygenase-2 and genetic analysis in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene was also performed. RESULTS: Continuous administration of sulindac resulted in obvious regression of both colorectal adenomatous polyps and gastric fundic gland polyps, and no cancers developed during the observation period. Immunohistochemical study showed the decrease of cyclooxygenase-2-positive epithelial cells in colorectal polyps by the treatment. The genetic analysis revealed a C to A substitution at nucleotide 481 of her germline adenomatous polyposis coli gene, which resulted in a nonsense mutation at codon 161. CONCLUSIONS: Our case suggests that treatment with sulindac accompanied by intensive colonoscopic surveillance may be a choice of management for attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis.